Thursday, January 19, 2012

Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right

Reviewed by Jason Farago for The Barnes & Noble Review

Skip to next paragraph

No figure on the American left knows more about the American right than Thomas Frank: columnist, editor, and hawkeyed observer of conservatism high and low.

In ?What?s the Matter With Kansas?,? his scathing 2004 classic on the politics of the American heartland, he shone a klieg light on the strange triumph of the right in what was once the epicenter of the American populist movement. In the Kansas of those days, wedge social issues from abortion to flag-burning served as the grease that helped the rich and powerful ram through spectacular tax cuts for themselves, normally at the expense of the very voters who'd put them in office.

But in Pity the Billionaire:The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right, his new book, Frank shows how thoroughly conservatism has mutated in the past few years. Coastal observers of the Tea Party phenomenon often assume that the tacky tri-cornered hats and elevation of the Constitution to holy writ function as a cover for the same old right, obsessed with the traditional God-guns-gays trifecta. In fact, as Frank saw during months on the road, "the fog of the culture wars has temporarily receded" ? and in its place, the foot soldiers of the right now focus their energy on the defense of radically free markets, exhorting capitalism at its most rapacious and government at its least effective.

What makes this new "hard-times conservatism" truly bizarre is that it arose in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the greatest failure of free market principles most Americans have ever lived through. Three years ago, every laissez-faire warrior from Alan Greenspan on down prostrated himself before Congress and the press, conceding that the system was broken. And yet from the ashes of the crisis arose not a third way, but a shrill, purified movement of hardcore anti-government activists. For Frank, it's as if "the public had demanded dozens of new nuclear power plants in the wake of the Three Mile Island disaster."

Until Obama's election, this kind of purist market worship was the preserve of political and economic elites ? "propaganda," to use Frank's blunt term, to keep
wealth in their own hands. Who knows if even they believed it? And yet in 2009 and 2010, a whole swath of Americans turned to "the sole utopian scheme available" to them, with effects that can only be called perverse. It's one thing for a CEO to declare that "corporations are people," if such an obscene claim leads to greater profits or power. Now, amazingly, the same line could be heard from ordinary voters. Even more strangely, middle- and working-class Americans were defending precisely the multinationals that had triggered the crisis and received the universally reviled bailouts. In the trough of the 2009 recession, Americans whose livelihoods had been destroyed by far-off bankers were actually rallying "to demand that bankers be freed from 'red tape' and the scrutiny of the law." At one surreal moment, Glenn Beck urged his followers to give away their cash to the US Chamber of Commerce, "the biggest, baddest business lobby in all of DC." They donated so much that they crashed its servers.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/dlh_8jQfZao/Pity-the-Billionaire-The-Hard-Times-Swindle-and-the-Unlikely-Comeback-of-the-Right

tinker tailor soldier spy rich forever rick ross project runway all stars elin nordegren kansas state tangled ever after king cake

Apple co-founder prefers Android phones, blasts Siri (Appolicious)

Steve Wozniak may have helped Steve Jobs build one of the greatest consumer electronics empires in the world, but this Apple co-founder admits that he loves his Android handset. During an interview with the Daily Beast, the Woz blasts the iPhone for its limitations and highlights a number of perks that Android brings, including voice commands that are better than Siri and navigation. ?My primary phone is the iPhone, I love the beauty of it,? Wozniak says. ?But I wish it did all the things my Android does, I really do.?

The statement was heard around the world, as Wozniak adds fuel to the bitter battle between Apple and Android. It?s a rivalry that hearkens back to the days of Apple versus Microsoft back in the 1990s, where Apple lost out to volume, pricing and accessibility. Wozniak thinks Apple?s mobile strategy may not be differentiated enough, however, saying ?there?s not as big a difference [between iOS and Android] as there was between Mac and Windows.?

Android losing control of its market?

Wozniak goes on to note Apple?s strict app approval process as a sticking point that ultimately gives Android the lead, and this has been a point of contention from day one. Apple?s been slow to give up control over its ecosystem, while Android may have given up too much control with its open app store. Some argue that Android?s openness is contributing to its detriment around fragmentation, some even saying that Google has no chance of regaining control. But it may not be total control Google?s after when it comes to Android. Its open source platform acts as a partner for manufacturers like Samsung and HTC, emboldening the Android ecosystem for rapid expansion and broad consumer appeal. It?s worked out quite well for handset makers, even enabling Samsung to compete on a more direct level with the Apple iPhone.

The dangers of Android patent infringement

But making Android phones does have its downside. Microsoft, the company that first beat out the Macintosh PC some decades ago, is looking to dominate the mobile scene any way it can. This strategy revolves around targeting Android manufacturers for licensing agreements, and Pantech could be next. South Korea?s third largest handset maker is reportedly in talks with Microsoft regarding the patent usage in its Android smartphones, and could end up paying around $5 per Android device sold. HTC and Samsung already have deals with Microsoft, which now collects fees from nearly 70 percent of Android device makers. South Korea?s second-largest handset maker, LG, just signed a deal last week.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/applecomputer/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/appolicious_rss/rss_appolicious_tc/http___www_androidapps_com_articles10786_apple_co_founder_prefers_android_phones_blasts_siri/44205448/SIG=134b0senq/*http%3A//www.androidapps.com/tech/articles/10786-apple-co-founder-prefers-android-phones-blasts-siri

patti stanger pasadena pasadena famu famu martina mcbride terry jones

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

?Iowa Boy? Offenburger crossways with GOP

Man about Iowa Offenburger spoke recently at a Southwest Iowa leadership conference

Former Des Moines Register ?Iowa Boy? columnist Chuck Offenburger considers himself a ?good Republican,? but he may be tossed from the Greene County Republican Central Committee Thursday night.

Offenburger faces a political show trial of sorts at the meeting because he publicly endorsed Democrat Christie Vilsack in her race against U.S. Rep. Steve King.

That has earned him and his future on the committee a spot on the agenda for Thursday night?s meeting.

?They have a rule that you have to support all Republican candidates and I consider that an infringement on my free speech rights,? said Offenburger, who retired from the Register in 1998? but has continued to be one of Iowa?s most prolific writers in books, magazines and his own Offenburger.com website.

Offenburger today lives in a farmhouse with wife Carla near Cooper, south of Jefferson.

The former newspaper columnist-turned-political activist has kept his characteristic sense of humor about the confrontation Thursday. Far from dreading the showdown, Offenburger is looking forward to it.

?I?ll? get to speak,? he said. ?That should be fun.?

?It?s part of the process, and I love politics,? said Offenburger, who in 1972 left his native Shenandoah for Des Moines and a reporting job with the Register. From the late 1970s to his retirement Offenburger?s ?Iowa Boy? column was a staple in the Register.

Once freed of journalistic requirements of objectivity, Offenburger discovered he was a ?Bob Ray Republican,? in his words.

That worked out great for Robert Ray, who defined moderate politics as one of Iowa?s most popular governors ever from 1969 to 1983. But in a more politically strident era, Offenburger?s political philosophy might hit a few rough edges in today?s GOP.

For instance, Offenburger is pro-life. But he?s also pro gay marriage and is in favor of ObamaCare (perhaps not surprising for a cancer survivor). In the current political cycle he supports Mitt Romney.

Offenburger?s backing of Christie Vilsack came from an old friendship and a shared love of writing and books. Christie Vilsack, wife of former Iowa governor and now U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, was frequent contributor to Offenburger?s website.

Offenburger said he doesn?t have anything against Rep. King, whom he says he likes personally. But he says he ?abhors? King?s politics.

Offenburger and his wife Carla have another quirk even more pronounced than being political moderates; they don?t have a television and get their political news and information from the internet and newspapers.

?It?s amazing how different politics looks when you don?t watch television,? said Offenburger. ?You don?t see the attack ads and you can get serious information that?s not on TV.

?

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IowaPolitics/~3/99GNOb5qjjc/

drake take care herman cain accuser herman cain accuser election day joe frazier where do i vote wheel of fortune

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Internet giants oppose Web control in India court (Reuters)

NEW DELHI (Reuters) ? Internet giants Google and Facebook told an Indian court on Monday that it is not possible for companies to block offensive content that appears on their websites, in a case that has stoked fears about censorship in the world's largest democracy.

Google and Facebook are among 21 companies that have been asked to develop a mechanism to block objectionable material, after a private petitioner took the websites to court over images deemed offensive to Hindus, Muslims and Christians.

At the heart of the dispute is a law passed last year in the country that makes companies responsible for user content posted on their websites, requiring them to take it down within 36 hours in case of a complaint.

The case was originally filed in a lower court, but the companies have appealed to the Delhi High Court, challenging the lower court's ruling asking them to take down some content.

"The search engine only takes you till the website. What happens after that is beyond a search engine's control," Neeraj Kishan Kaul, a lawyer for Google's Indian unit, told a packed High Court hearing on Monday.

"If you use blocks, which is very easy for people to say, you will inadvertently block other things as well. For example: the word 'sex'. Even a government document like a voter ID list or a passport has the word 'sex'," he added.

Siddharth Luthra, a lawyer for Facebook told the court it was not possible for the social network to "single out" any individual on the basis of religion or views and said the users should be held responsible for content they post.

Less than a tenth of India's 1.2 billion population have access to Internet although its 100-odd million users make it the third biggest Internet market after China and the United States. Internet users in India are seen nearly tripling to 300 million over the next three years.

Despite the new rules to block offensive content, India's Internet access is still largely free unlike the tight controls in neighboring China.

Civil rights groups have opposed the new laws. But politicians say that posting offensive images in the socially conservative country with a history of violence between religious groups presents a danger to the public as Internet use grows.

The high court will resume hearing the case on Thursday, Justice Suresh Kait said. The judge was last week quoted by local media warning the websites of China-style controls if they did not create a means to curb material seen as offensive.

(Writing by Devidutta Tripathy; Editing by Matthias Williams)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/internet/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120116/wr_nm/us_india_websites

kevin hart idris elba kelsey grammer donald driver donald driver octavia spencer mlk day

Monday, January 16, 2012

Six more killed in Syria despite Arab monitors (Reuters)

BEIRUT (Reuters) ? Five civilians were killed in Syria and a brigadier was assassinated on Monday in violence that has not abated despite an Arab peace plan monitored by Arab League observers.

Arab League foreign ministers will meet on Sunday to discuss the future of the mission sent last month to check if Syria is abiding by the Arab plan it accepted on November 2.

The plan required Syria to halt the bloodshed, withdraw the military from cities, free detainees and hold a dialogue.

Hundreds of people have been reported killed in Syria even since the monitors deployed on December 26 as forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad try to crush peaceful protests that began 10 months ago, as well as armed resistance to his rule.

Random gunfire from pro-Assad militiamen killed five people, including a woman, and wounded nine in the restive city of Homs, the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

The state news agency SANA said an "armed terrorist group" had shot dead Brigadier-General Mohammed Abdul-Hamid al-Awad and wounded his driver in the countryside near Damascus.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

For graphic on Arab League http://link.reuters.com/pev65s

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The latest violence erupted a day after U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told Assad to "stop killing your people."

Assad's harsh response to the uprising has killed more than 5,000 people, by a U.N. count. The Syrian authorities say 2,000 members of the security forces have also been killed. The deaths of 32 civilians and soldiers were reported on Sunday.

"STOP KILLING YOUR PEOPLE"

"Today, I say again to President Assad of Syria: stop the violence, stop killing your people. The path of repression is a dead end," Ban told a conference in Lebanon on Sunday.

The head of the Arab monitoring mission is due to report to an Arab League committee on Thursday, ahead of a wider meeting of Arab foreign ministers to consider their next step on Syria.

Qatar, which heads the League committee on Syria, has suggested Arab troops step in to stop the killing, an idea which is anathema to Damascus and which several Arab countries, including Iraq, Lebanon and Algeria, are likely to oppose.

An Arab representative to the Cairo-based League said it had received no formal proposal for such military intervention.

The League also has the option of referring Syria to the U.N. Security Council, which has so far failed to take any action due to opposition from Russia and China to any resolution that could lead to U.N. sanctions or Western military action.

There is little Western appetite for any Libya-style intervention. The United States, the European Union, Turkey and the Arab League have announced economic sanctions against Syria.

Assad proclaimed an amnesty on Sunday for "crimes" committed during the uprising and some detainees were later freed in the presence of Arab monitors in Damascus.

Kinan al-Shami, of the Syrian Revolution Coordination Union, said hundreds of detainees appeared to have been released, but they represented only a fraction of at least 40,000 people he said had been jailed without charge since March, many of whom have been held in secret police buildings or makeshift prisons.

Among those freed, Shami said, was Syrian actor Jalal al-Tawil who was shot and captured while trying to flee to Jordan two weeks ago. He had earlier been beaten in a Damascus protest.

Assad has issued several amnesties in recent months, but opposition groups say thousands of people remain behind bars and many have been tortured or abused, with some killed in custody.

The movement to end more than four decades of Assad family rule began with largely peaceful demonstrations, but after months of violence by the security forces, army deserters and insurgents started to fight back, prompting fears of civil war.

Assad, who retains the support of core military units, is backed by his own Alawite minority as well as some minority Christians and some majority Sunni Muslims who fear chaos, civil war and the rise of Islamist militancy if he is toppled.

The president, 46, who appeared in public twice in as many days last week, is eager to show that his people love him.

SANA, the state news agency, reported on Sunday that a 10 km (six mile) long letter, which it billed as the world's longest, was being written and signed by Syrians across the country as a "message of loyalty to the homeland and its leader."

(Additional reporting by Khaled Yacoub Oweis in Amman and Dominic Evans and Erika Solomon in Beirut)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/world/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120116/wl_nm/us_syria

19 kids and counting 2011 election results 11/11/11 11 11 11 activision blizzard acrylamide advent calendar

Children Exposed to HIV Before Birth at Risk for Language Delay (HealthDay)

THURSDAY, Jan. 12 (HealthDay News) -- School-age children exposed to HIV before birth are at increased risk for language problems and could benefit from early diagnosis and classroom intervention, according to a new study.

Researchers looked at 468 children, ages 7 to 16, born to mothers with HIV infection during pregnancy. Of those children, 306 were HIV-infected and 162 did not have HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

Overall, 35 percent of the children had difficulty understanding spoken words and expressing themselves verbally, said the researchers at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and other institutions.

On a series of language ability tests, the average score of the children exposed to HIV before birth was in the lowest 21 percent of all children who have taken the test.

All the children exposed to HIV before birth tended to have language delays, regardless of whether they later become infected with HIV, the researchers said.

"Our results show that children exposed to HIV have more than twice the chance of having a language impairment than do children in the general population," Dr. George Siberry, of the Pediatric, Adolescent and Maternal AIDS Branch of the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, said in an NIH news release.

The researchers weren't able to determine if the high rates of language problems in HIV-exposed children are actually due to HIV exposure or are caused by other factors, such as family status, mothers' substance use, environment, or social or economic background.

The study recently appeared in the Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics.

Routine screening for language impairment might benefit children exposed to HIV before birth, even if they don't have any obvious signs of language problems, the researchers suggested.

More information

The U.S. National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities has more about speech and language impairments.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/diseases/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20120113/hl_hsn/childrenexposedtohivbeforebirthatriskforlanguagedelay

spanier walmart black friday ad walmart black friday ad rick perry gaffe rick perry gaffe graham spanier graham spanier

Sunday, January 15, 2012

SC makes it harder to get unemployment benefits (AP)

COLUMBIA, S.C. ? A state with chronically high unemployment is making it tougher for the jobless to draw benefits by trying to force people to take lower-wage jobs and making it easier for laid-off workers to be declared ineligible.

New policies at South Carolina's Department of Employment and Workforce require people to accept job offers that pay incrementally less than their previous wages ? eventually leading to minimum wage ? and reducing the number of weeks someone let go for misconduct can receive benefits.

Department director and Maj. Gen. Abraham Turner told a state Senate committee Thursday that the policies begin immediately, but technology upgrades needed for the job-offer-acceptance plan are expected to take six months.

Turner said it's about providing an incentive to the jobless to get busy finding a new job, not turning down offers.

"We're trying to prohibit that person drawing unemployment from sitting back and not aggressively going after the jobs," said Turner, who took the agency's helm in September. "The jobs are there."

Sen. Phil Leventis, D-Sumter, questioned that assertion, given the state's unemployment rate.

South Carolina's unemployment rate is 9.9 percent and has not been below 9 percent in three years. The average unemployment benefit payment in South Carolina is $235, ranking 45th nationwide. The maximum someone can receive is $326 weekly, which equates to a salary of less than $17,000.

Sue Berkowitz of the Appleseed Legal Justice Center said it was unfair to think people are refusing jobs to collect unemployment benefits "because they somehow enjoy living on a wage that doesn't support them."

Under the policy, the longer someone is unemployed, the lower the salary they must accept in a job offer. After four weeks, they must take a job offering 90 percent of what they were making. The percentage drops every four weeks, to 70 percent after 16. After federally paid extensions kick in at 20 weeks, it would eventually drop to minimum wage.

The system expects businesses to notify the state when it has offered a job to someone collecting unemployment. The agency could not require employers to participate, but Turner said he believes businesses will welcome the plan because reducing the number of unemployed people would lower their unemployment insurance taxes.

Leventis called it social engineering.

"What you're about to do with folks is disestablish all the credentials they've ever had. Now they're in food service when they used to be making $80,000 a year and will never be viable to compete in that area again because South Carolina decided to do a social experiment," he said.

But Republican senators said plenty of people are taking jobs they're not accustomed to in order to support their families during these tough economic times.

"I was raised that there's honor in hard work, no matter what it is," said Sen. Kevin Bryant, R-Anderson. "It's honorable to take a minimum-wage job if that's all there is."

Another policy change cuts length of benefits for employees let go for absenteeism, poor attitude, violating policies or poor work quality.

The change means they could get a maximum of four weeks of state-approved benefits. It could save an estimated $32 million, reducing employers' unemployment insurance taxes by 5 percent, he said.

But senators said that doesn't go far enough. Bryant noted those fired workers could still collect up to 61 total weeks of unemployment, when including federal extensions. He argued that workers fired for misconduct of any kind should be ineligible for benefits.

"We're going to reward you for not showing up to work?" Bryant asked. "If absenteeism isn't gross misconduct, what is?"

Gross misconduct already completely disqualifies people. The definition includes theft, alcohol use, property damage, assault, and insubordination. Bryant wanted Turner to change policy to also disqualify someone fired for misconduct.

Turner said that would require a change in state law. Sen. Lee Bright, R-Roebuck, said he plans to introduce the legislation to do so.

"Citizens around the state believe the unemployment system for most part is for people who lost jobs through no fault of their own," Bright said. "We're gotten to the point where we've diluted personal responsibility to be miniscule."

Other senators expressed concern about employers claiming a worker was fired for misconduct in order to get out of paying benefits, especially when it comes to a poor attitude claim. Turner said such cases are rare.

Berkowitz said absenteeism isn't as simple as just skipping work, but a worker could be fired for being absent while caring for a sick child or elderly parent.

"I don't know when people on unemployment became the new targets," Berkowitz said. "We're talking about people hurting and losing their homes and not being able to feed their families and losing their self-esteem. We're not taking into account these are real people's lives."

Under another policy change, people drawing benefits will be required to conduct at least one job search per week through the agency's online system.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/economy/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120113/ap_on_re_us/us_sc_unemployment_benefits

kevin durant rutgers mark hurd new ipad 3 baylor jodie fisher zooey deschanel